SUMMATIVE ESSAY: JOHN LOCKE AND MODERN AMERICA
By P.R. Eaton
Some
elements within the American body politic have manipulated the ideas of liberalism
to negate and replace religion with a desire to centralize authority for
certain controls; the ideas espoused by John Locke have been embraced by both
of the main political parties of the United States but with very different
results with liberalism of the left by fully embracing Locke's concepts of
individualism yet rejecting theology and religion, and replacing it with centralized
government.
How have Lockean ideas played out in modern American politics?
Do the writings and ideas of John Locke manifest
themselves in public policy today?
What is fundamentally missing from Locke’s ideas on
government?
John
Locke founded the idea or concept of a ‘protective democracy’ that was bound by
a social contract between the people, as a body, and those that represented the
people. John Locke’s ideas continue to influence concepts associated with
liberal individualism, individual rights, and political independence.
John
Locke influenced the framers of American independence and the architects of the
Constitution. The framers forcefully addressed the desire for liberty;
individual freedoms of life, liberty, and property. The ideas espoused by
Locke, known as liberalism, are being fought over today by the two dominant
political parties of the United States.
Locke
gave birth to the ideas of individualism, freedom, and limited government. The
very ideas of liberalism, especially within one political party, has jettisoned
the outright association with religion and has replaced it a selfish identity.
T.S.
Eliot cautions that liberalism, however, can be used to control, to negate, and
is a movement more defined by its starting point rather than by its end and as
such, liberalism is incapable of enduring.
Footnotes
M. J. Cresswell, “Legitimizing Force: A Lockean Account,” Armed Forces and Society, (July 1, 2004 Research Article),
https://doi-org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1177/0095327X0403000406
Daniel McCarthy, “John
Locke: Liberal, Libertarian, Or License To Kill?” The American Conservative, (3
October, 2013),
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/john-locke-liberal-libertarian-or-license-to-kill/
Jake Meador, “T.S. Eliot on
Liberalism’s Greatest Problem,” The Calvinist International, (26 December, 2014),
https://calvinistinternational.com/2014/12/26/ts-eliot-liberalisms-greatest-problem/
R.R. Reno, “Eliot and Liberalism,”
First Things, (4 January, 2016),
https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2016/01/eliot-and-liberalism
Lee Ward, “Locke on
the Moral Basis of International Relations,” American Journal of Political
Science, (21
June 2006),
https://doi-org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00210.x
Armitage, David, Foundations
of Modern International Thought, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2012)
doi:10.1017/CBO9781139032940.
Eicholz, Hans L. Harmonizing Sentiments: The Declaration
of Independence and the Jeffersonian Idea of Self-Government. New York:
Peter Lang, 2001.
Hannan, Daniel. Inventing Freedom: How the English-Speaking
Peoples Made the Modern World (New York: Harper Collins, 2013).
Locke, John, Locke’s
Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Volume I, (Edinburgh: Mundell &
Sons, 1798).
Nevins, Paul L, The Politics of
Selfishness: How John Locke's Legacy Is Paralyzing America, (Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010).
McDonald, Forrest. Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Intellectual
Origins of the Constitution. University Press of Kansas, 1985.
Robbins, Caroline. The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman.
Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004.
Comments
Post a Comment