Précis: "Conventional Commanders in an Unconventional War: The U.S. Army in Vietnam 1965-1972"

-

  "Conventional Commanders in an Unconventional War: The U.S. Army in Vietnam 1965-1972"

Précis

Thesis and Conclusions: Patrick R. Eaton’s dissertation examines the pivotal role of U.S. Army maneuver battalion and brigade commanders during the Vietnam War (1965-1973). The thesis contends that these commanders, many of whom were veterans of World War II and the Korean War, significantly influenced U.S. military strategy and tactics in Vietnam. Their leadership shaped the operational execution of Military Assistance Command-Vietnam’s (MACV) directives, contributing to the evolution of counterinsurgency and conventional warfare tactics. Eaton concludes that while high-level strategies are often scrutinized, the contributions and challenges faced by these mid-level commanders were critical to the overall U.S. effort in Vietnam. Furthermore, despite being part of a flawed and evolving strategy, these commanders directly impacted combat operations and, by extension, influenced the strategic trajectory of the war.

Historiographical Contribution: Eaton’s work addresses a gap in the historiography of the Vietnam War. While much of the existing scholarship focuses on the macro-political and diplomatic dimensions of the conflict, Eaton offers a bottom-up perspective by concentrating on the maneuver commanders' experiences. His study diverges from traditional top-down analyses of military leadership, particularly those focusing on generals like William Westmoreland and Creighton Abrams. Instead, Eaton positions the battalion and brigade commanders as key actors whose decisions at the operational level shaped battlefield outcomes and indirectly affected the overarching military strategy.

This research complements existing studies by historians like Gregory Daddis, who has highlighted the multi-dimensional challenges faced by MACV. However, Eaton shifts the focus to the tactical commanders, making this the first comprehensive study of these officers as a cohesive group. By doing so, he challenges the more conventional historiography that overlooks the contribution of mid-level commanders in shaping military strategy.

New Primary Sources and Methodology: Eaton utilizes a wealth of previously underexplored primary sources, including Combat After-Action Reports, Lessons Learned, and End of Tour Exit Interviews from over 700 senior leaders and commanders. These sources provide firsthand accounts of the commanders' experiences and decision-making processes, offering insights into how tactical leaders interpreted and implemented MACV’s evolving strategy. Eaton’s innovative approach to quantifying and analyzing these commanders’ backgrounds, including their previous combat experience and training, allows for a nuanced understanding of their leadership in an unconventional war.

Through oral history collections from archives like the U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center, and primary documents housed at institutions such as Texas Tech University’s Vietnam Center, Eaton constructs a detailed analysis of how these commanders responded to conventional military engagements and counterinsurgency efforts. The study employs qualitative and quantitative methodologies, offering a blend of statistical analysis and narrative exploration of the commanders' actions in Vietnam.

 Contributions to Historiography: Eaton’s dissertation critically reassessed the Vietnam War by positioning the maneuver commanders as central to understanding the war’s outcomes. It contrasts with orthodox and revisionist narratives that focus either on high-level military and political leadership or the failures of U.S. strategy. Instead, Eaton's work suggests that the war's outcomes were also shaped by the decisions of those implementing strategy on the ground. His analysis contributes to a broader understanding of military leadership in the Vietnam War. It introduces a new perspective on the relationship between tactical and strategic decision-making during the conflict.

Innovative Findings: One of the key findings of Eaton's work is the extent to which these mid-level commanders navigated both the kinetic (combat) and non-kinetic (pacification and civil assistance) elements of warfare. He challenges the dominant narrative that MACV was exclusively focused on attrition-based warfare. Eaton’s study reveals that many commanders were acutely aware of the need for counterinsurgency measures, including village security, infrastructure development, and civil affairs programs. Moreover, he demonstrates how these commanders’ previous experiences in World War II and Korea influenced their operational approaches in Vietnam, often shaping the evolution of tactics during the war.








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“U.S. MARINE CORPS PRE-WAR TRAINING AND THE BATTLE OF BELLEAU WOOD: 1917-1918”

-
Image
I : Introduction                     The fighting in Belleau Wood, France, in  June, 1918 saw the command of the U.S. Marine 6th Machine Gun Battalion change hands four times in 11 days. Such was the nature of the vicious fight between the 4th Marine Brigade of the 2nd Infantry Division (U.S. Army) and the Germans pushing towards Paris. By all accounts, this first real test of the U.S Marines in the First World War, was a bloodletting that should have ended in a rout as the experienced and veteran German machine gunners tore into the inexperienced U.S. Marines. Rather than collapse, the 4th Marine Brigade withstood the German assaults and not only held firm, but triumphed. The U.S. Marine Corps 5th and 6th Marine Regiments in 1918 fought against the veteran and very experienced German infantry. This study seeks to identify how ad hoc Marine Corps infantry battalions and the newly formed 4...
Read more

1968 TET OFFENSIVE: The Beginning of the End for Continued U.S. Involvement in Vietnam

-
Image
  The Vietnam War after the Tet Offensive of 1968   The 1968 “Tet” Offensive spread out across South Vietnam between 30 and 31 January. The offensive produced shock both politically and militarily in the capital cities of Saigon and Washington D.C. The purpose of the offensive, in the extreme, was for Hanoi to cause a general uprising across the beleaguered cities of South Vietnam; a ‘popular enjoining’ of the fight by sympathetic South Vietnamese against the South Vietnamese government and her mighty ally, the United States. Sam Adams, a CIA analyst who was stationed in Vietnam at the time, believes Hanoi’s chief objective was to “jolt American public opinion right before the American elections. And in my view they succeeded in spades in doing that. [1] And at minimum, to cause chaos, sow worry and concern for South Vietnamese citizens and Americans alike, and to influence American public opinion. Surely the calculus of the North Vietnamese took into consideration the fre...
Read more

Generals Lee, Sherman, And Grant: The Tactical vs the Strategic

-
Image
  Generals Lee, Sherman, And Grant: The Tactical vs the Strategic General Tecumseh Sherman has been memorialized for his “March to the Sea,” the carnage wrought upon Georgia from November to December of 1864. This campaign was the culmination of his own unique strategy, developed as a subordinate of General Grant, and as a student of his own successes and failings during the three previous years of campaigning against the Confederacy. Sherman had seen Grants magnificence in the Vicksburg campaign in 1863. Grant had all but abandoned his logistics columns and supply lines after they were destroyed by Confederate Cavalry. Undeterred, Grant continued. Sherman modeled this concept during his own “Meridian” Campaign in Mississippi. Sherman is more remembered for his Armies ‘March to the Sea’, burning and wrecking most of Georgia along the way. “He fought in the battles at Shiloh , Vicksburg , and Chattanooga with mixed results, but he is the only man to twice receive the thanks of Co...
Read more

"CONVENTIONAL COMMANDERS IN AN UNCONVENTIONAL WAR: THE U.S. ARMY IN VIETNAM 1965-1967"

-
Image
INTRODUCTION                  Between 1965 and 1968 the majority of the Infantry Brigade and Battalion commanders fighting in Vietnam were veterans of the Second World War and/or the Korean war. Who were these   WWII veterans who led the U.S. Army in Vietnam and, as a group, how did they interpret their assigned tasks during the first two years of America’s involvement in Vietnam. This study illustrates how the ‘first wave’ of maneuver commanders, of whom a majority were veterans of the Second World War or Korea, adapted to myriad of conditions they faced across the 44 provinces in the Republic of Vietnam.   Within the historiography of the U.S. Army in Vietnam, the secondary literature concentrates on the strategy developed and implemented by the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) and the ‘search and destroy’ operations executed across the country. A small group of scholars have argued that without any clear method th...
Read more